{"id":209,"date":"2015-12-02T13:08:22","date_gmt":"2015-12-02T13:08:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/?p=209"},"modified":"2024-10-02T08:42:59","modified_gmt":"2024-10-02T08:42:59","slug":"humanism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/2015\/12\/02\/humanism\/","title":{"rendered":"Humanism"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kloe Fowler\u00a0took the \u2018Philosophical Britain<\/a>\u2018 module at Queen Mary in 2015. In this post she writes about \u2018Humanism\u2019 as a\u00a0philosophical keyword<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\"Professor<\/a>

Professor Richard Dawkins on a London bus displaying the Atheist message.
Photograph: Anthony Devlin\/PA<\/p><\/div>\n

You may remember, back in 2009, seeing London buses adorned with a message reading \u2018there probably is no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life\u2019. The campaign was the creation of the British Humanist Association (BHA), a national Humanist group whose campaigners felt that the adverts would be a \u2018reassuring antidote\u2019 to religious adverts which \u2018threaten eternal damnation\u2019 to passengers. <\/a><\/p>\n

The word \u2018humanist\u2019 preceded the word \u2018humanism\u2019 and began life with different connotations to its present day meaning. The word umanista <\/em>was first employed in fifteenth century Italy as a slang term to describe a university professor of the studia humanitatis –<\/em> the humanities. However the word \u2018humanism\u2019, in roughly the same context we speak of it today, first appeared in the German form humanismus<\/em> as late as 1808.[1]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

To define\u2026 humanism briefly, I would say that it is a philosophy of joyous service for the greater good of all humanity in this natural world and advocating the methods of reason, science, and democracy. –\u00a0Corliss Lamont.[2]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The roots of humanist philosophy lie with the \u2018fathers of humanism\u2019. The early fourteenth-century Italian scholar, Francesco Petrarch<\/a>, is often accredited with being one of the first humanists. Petrarch rejected traditional medieval scholarship in favor of a revival of Classical authors like Aristotle, Plato and Tacitus and, by doing so, Petrarch laid the foundations for a philosophy which would eventually manifest in a formally recognized movement, punctuated by national organizations and institutions.[3]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Desiderius<\/a>

Desiderius Erasmus’s Collectanea Adagiorum (1518)
Photograph: Bavarian State Library<\/p><\/div>\n

Petrarch\u2019s ideas were developed further during the Renaissance. The word \u2018Renaissance\u2019 derives from the French term for \u2018rebirth\u2019 and it is accepted by most to mean the revival of classical scholarship and learning in Western Europe between 1400 and 1600.[4]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a>\u00a0 Renaissance humanists were followers of literary, Christian humanism<\/a>, where the pursuit of self-knowledge was seen as a way of getting closer to God whilst also emphasising the principles of the Holy Trinity, namely the role of Jesus as the human son of God the Father.[5]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a> The popularity of humanism during the Renaissance can be seen in the rising popularity of humanist literature. Desiderius Erasmus, for example, emphasised the importance of Greek scholarship via manuscripts like the Adagia.<\/em> The Adagia<\/em> began life in 1500 as a collection of eight-hundred and eighteen Greek proverbs. By the death of Erasmus in 1536, the collection had grown to around four-hundred and fifty-one proverbs.[6]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The eighteenth century witnessed a departure from Christian humanism. The age of Enlightenment was characterised by scientific discovery, which consequently ushered in a new definition of humanism. Eighteenth century humanism became fixated on ideas of rationality, reason and the natural order. Auguste Comte, the \u2018father of sociology,\u2019 even attempted to rationalise the twelve-month Gregorian calendar by devising a new thirteen-month calendar with an extra day to worship the dead and a system for leap years. Finally, Comte proposed that each month be named after a Classical graeco-Roman scholar hence, March would become \u2018Aristotle\u2019.[7]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The philosophy of \u2018Positivism\u2019<\/a> was the brainchild of Comte. It stipulated that any attempts to prove truths about the world were futile unless they were based on sense perception or empirical scientific evidence.[8]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a> Over time, Comte combined his Positivist ideals with existing humanist ones and embodied them in the formation of the \u2018Religion of Humanity\u2019.<\/a> The Religion of Humanity was an atheistic religion which aimed to eliminate transcendence and superstition but maintain religious rituals and ethical teaching.<\/p>\n

\"A<\/a>

A Positivist Church in Porto Alegre, Brazil (2014)
Photograph: the Science University of Iceland<\/p><\/div>\n

\u00a0\u201cOn or about December 1910, human nature changed\u2026 all human reactions shifted\u2026 and when human relations change, there is at the same time a change in religion, conduct, politics and literature\u201d \u2013 Virginia Woolf.[9]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The early disasters of the early twentieth century resulted in widespread pessimism and disillusionment<\/a> in Europe. People began to identify that humanism had been unable to prevent any of the disasters which had affected them.[10]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a> However, post-war disillusionment was endemic only to wartime and the humanist philosophy made a quick recovery, particularly among the Allied nations. In 1952, in Amsterdam, the humanist movement became formally recognised as the \u2018International Humanist and Ethical Union\u2019 (IHEU).<\/a><\/p>\n

At around the same time, Marxist principles were brought to bear on Humanism. Karl Marx\u2019s early writings, like The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 <\/em>and The German Ideology, <\/em>concentrated on Marx\u2019s theory of \u2018alienation,\u2019<\/a> the idea that humans had lost their natural attributes and abilities as a result of living in an artificial, class-based society. In 1953 Nikita Khrushchev espoused these ideas at a party congress and consequently delivered a current of class-conscious \u2018Marxist Humanism\u2019 across Western Europe. By 1966, Erich Fromm and several other Marxist and \u2018new left wing\u2019 Humanists had outlined their world-view in An International Symposium of Socialist Humanism. <\/em><\/p>\n

In 1961 Julian Huxley<\/a>\u00a0(grandson of ‘Darwin’s Bulldog’ Thomas Huxley, and brother of novelist Aldous Huxley),\u00a0further consolidated the Humanist world-view by compiling works by himself and twenty-five other leading thinkers into a comprehensive volume called The Humanist Frame.<\/em> Unusually, Huxley was a somewhat fanatical believer of Humanism. He viewed Humanism as a revolutionary, world-unifying philosophy. Huxley says \u2018Humanism is seminal. We must learn what it means and then disseminate humanist ideas and finally inject them where possible into practical affairs as a guiding frame\u2019.[11]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cBecause humanists believe in the unity of humanity and have faith in the future of man, they have never been fanatics\u201d \u2013 Erich Fromm.[12]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As we emerge into the twenty-first century, for the first time in history, mankind has been brought together by worldwide global problems. Issues like international security, the population explosion and the needs of third-world countries have recently begun to be addressed.[13]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a> The international climate of humanitarian humanism has been most recently demonstrated by the global response to the ongoing Ebola epidemic in Western Africa.<\/p>\n

However, Humanism has still not acquired the recognition it deserves. Since the millennium, western society has been dogged by the threat of terrorism. The paradoxical rise of religious fundamentalism in the Middle East not only threatens the west with disruption and violence but it also threatens the west with the internal indoctrination of its peoples. Since the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris, reports of atrocities committed by the radical Islamic group Islamic State (IS) have appeared daily in British news. Moreover, the UK Foreign Office estimates that around four-hundred Britons have travelled to Syria to fight for IS.<\/a><\/p>\n

\"A<\/a>

A motif which embodies the contemporary definition of Humanism (2014).\u00a0Photograph: International Humanist and Ethical Union<\/p><\/div>\n

In light of this threat it seems to me that now is the perfect time for British society to adopt the principles of humanism. The atheist, collectivist and humanitarian qualities of humanism are invaluable to a modern nation tormented by the threat of violence and radicalism. The Atheist Bus campaign was launched six years ago and the BHA has not launched a repeat campaign since. Unfortunately, the marketing department at the BHA seems to be redundant at a time when British society is desperate for the reassurance of a shared, rational belief system.<\/p>\n

Whilst writing this post I stumbled upon a motif which was of great interest to me. To my understanding, it perfectly exemplifies our contemporary understanding of the word Humanism. It advocates knowledge, rationalism, human rights, liberty and collectivism and is contextualised by the recent Charlie Hebdo tragedy<\/a> and cast in front of the universally-recognised humanist logo.<\/p>\n

So, I will conclude with a proposal. I propose that the BHA awake from their redundancy and advocate the updated definition of Humanism. I suggest that they renew their campaign and use this motif, combined with public transport, as a vehicle for disseminating humanist ideas. With the help of evolved humanist philosophy, perhaps the East and West will one day be able to reconcile their differences in a rational and humanitarian way.<\/p>\n

\n

Further\u00a0Reading<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

A. Bullock, The Humanist Tradition in the West <\/em>(New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company, 1985).<\/p>\n

N. Everitt, The Non-Existence of God <\/em>(London: Routledge, 2004).<\/p>\n

E. Fromm (ed) An International Symposium of Socialist Humanism <\/em>(New York: Anchor Books, 1966).<\/p>\n

P. O. Kristeller, Renaissance Thought and the Arts: Collected Essays <\/em>(New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1964).<\/p>\n

C. Lamont, The Philosophy of Humanism, Eighth Edition <\/em>(New York: Humanist Press, 1997).<\/p>\n

J. S. Mill, Auguste Comte and Positivism <\/em>(London: Trubner and Co, 1865).<\/p>\n

L. and M. Morain, Humanism as the Next Step <\/em>(Washington: The Humanist Press, 2012)\u00a0(Click here to download your free copy from the American Humanist Association)<\/a><\/u><\/p>\n

\n

References<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> A. Bullock, The Humanist Tradition in the West <\/em>(New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company, 1985) p.12.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> C. Lamont, The Philosophy of Humanism, Eighth Edition <\/em>(New York: Humanist Press, 1997) pp.12-13.<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> R. Morris, \u2018Petrarch, the first humanist\u2019 The New York Times, http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/05\/29\/style\/29iht-conway_ed3__0.html [accessed: 14\/02\/2015 01:05].<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> W. R. Estep, Renaissance and Reformation <\/em>(Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1986) p.20.<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> J. Zimmermann, Incarnational Humanism: A Philosophy of Culture for the Church in the World <\/em>(Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2012) p.118.<\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> J. McConica, \u2018Erasmus Disiderius, c.1467-1536\u2019 in H. G. Matthew and B. Harrison (eds) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography <\/em>(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).<\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> E. Asprem, \u2018Positivism and the Religion of Humanity\u2019 Heterodoxology, http:\/\/heterodoxology.com\/2010\/03\/08\/positivism-and-the-religion-of-humanity\/ [accessed: 14\/02\/2015 01:35].<\/p>\n

[8]<\/a> H. B. Acton, \u2018Comte\u2019s Positivism and the Science of Society\u2019 Philosophy, <\/em>Vol.26, No.99 (1951) pp.291-310.<\/p>\n

[9]<\/a> Bullock, The Humanist Tradition in the West, <\/em>p.133.<\/p>\n

[10]<\/a> J. Vanheste, Guardians of the Humanist Legacy: T. S. Eliot\u2019s Criterion Network and its relevance to our Postmodern World <\/em>(Leiden: Brill, 2007). p.3.<\/p>\n

[11]<\/a> J. Huxley (ed)The Humanist Frame <\/em>(New York: George Allen and Unwin, 1961) pp.11-49.<\/p>\n

[12]<\/a> E. Fromm (ed) Socialist Humanism: An International Symposium <\/em>(New York: Anchor Books, 1966) p.vii.<\/p>\n

[13]<\/a> H. J. Blackham, Humanism <\/em>(Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1968) pp.22-23.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kloe Fowler\u00a0took the \u2018Philosophical Britain\u2018 module at Queen Mary in 2015. In this post she writes about \u2018Humanism\u2019 as a\u00a0philosophical keyword.<\/em><\/p>\n

Professor Richard Dawkins on a London bus displaying the Atheist message.Photograph: Anthony Devlin\/PA<\/p>\n

You may remember, back in 2009, seeing London buses adorned with a message reading \u2018there probably is no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life\u2019. The campaign was the creation of the British Humanist Association (BHA), a national Humanist group whose campaigners felt that the […]
Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[24,148,142,141,140,152,147,150,143,149,151,145,27,146,144],"class_list":["post-209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philosophical-keywords","tag-auguste-comte","tag-bha","tag-christian-humanism","tag-humanism","tag-humanist","tag-humanitarian-humanism","tag-iheu","tag-julian-huxley","tag-literary-humanism","tag-marxist-humanism","tag-peace","tag-positivism","tag-religion","tag-religion-of-humanity","tag-renaissance-humanism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":897,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209\/revisions\/897"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.history.qmul.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}